Petite But Ornery Girls Gone Buck Wild
In case you missed the story on Saturday, the New York Daily News reported (in language that has already gained email-forwarded notoriety) that "A gang of petite but ornery lesbians pummeled and stabbed a DVD bootlegger in the West Village early yesterday after he tried to pick up one of the women - and then spat on her when she rebuffed his advances, police and witnesses said."
(someone at the NYDN named this image file LESBIAN2.jpg, by the way)
That coverage of the 2 a.m. beatdown (featuring the quasi-racist hed "Girls gone wilding" and the lesbo-sensationalist deck "Lesbians locked up in W. Village beating") was, believe it or not, more fair and balanced than the NYT coverage, which failed to even mention that the women (and independent witnesses) claimed the man was commiting a hate crime against them, or even that they were openly lesbian and had just argued with him about it.
The Times headline indicates its bias immediately; "Man Is Stabbed in Attack After Admiring a Stranger."
The NYT ended its piece with the line "“It’s not a crime to say hello to a human being,” Mr. Buckle said. “Now, I think I’ll know which girls not to talk to.”" You're damn right you will. As musician and queer activist Reginald Lamar remarked when I told him about it, "I applaud those women. As someone who faces daily street harassment, I hope that maybe a few of those motherfuckers will think twice now. I think it's just beautiful."
Lesbian blogger Alana Post was more circumspect. "I kind of feel like this is a good example of why that doesn't work. Because in general all it does is give fodder to stories that are written to make the disenfranchised party involved look awful, the bigot look like the victim, etc. Fueling increased hatred from bigots in general, who can look to the news for justification."
At least the NYDN, despite its sensationalistic reportage, gave the women a voice:
I'm still processing how intensely fucked up the media coverage of these black lesbians defending themselves has been (especially in the context of a recent uptick of anti-gay violence in New York, with a couple high-profile violent bashings). And I've read some fucked up reactions online, too.
So much of the story is so cinematic ("Foxfire!" as Caroline said). Here is Patreece's (severely tricked out) Myspace page, and here's Terrain's.
(someone at the NYDN named this image file LESBIAN2.jpg, by the way)
That coverage of the 2 a.m. beatdown (featuring the quasi-racist hed "Girls gone wilding" and the lesbo-sensationalist deck "Lesbians locked up in W. Village beating") was, believe it or not, more fair and balanced than the NYT coverage, which failed to even mention that the women (and independent witnesses) claimed the man was commiting a hate crime against them, or even that they were openly lesbian and had just argued with him about it.
The Times headline indicates its bias immediately; "Man Is Stabbed in Attack After Admiring a Stranger."
It all began harmlessly, the victim, a 28-year-old man from Queens said, with a comment he made to a woman who walked past him early yesterday on a Manhattan sidewalk.While the Times stopped short of branding these women Aileen Wuornos lesbian killers on the loose (and black!), the subtext was not subtle. In fact, there were no subtleties to the Times coverage at all. A complicated situation was reduced to an innocent man attacked by hysterical women.
But things quickly escalated into an ugly and ultimately violent confrontation that led to the man, Dwayne Buckle, being stabbed in his abdomen with a steak knife, and to the arrests of seven women, ranging in age from 18 to 31 who are accused in the attack, the police said.
The NYT ended its piece with the line "“It’s not a crime to say hello to a human being,” Mr. Buckle said. “Now, I think I’ll know which girls not to talk to.”" You're damn right you will. As musician and queer activist Reginald Lamar remarked when I told him about it, "I applaud those women. As someone who faces daily street harassment, I hope that maybe a few of those motherfuckers will think twice now. I think it's just beautiful."
Lesbian blogger Alana Post was more circumspect. "I kind of feel like this is a good example of why that doesn't work. Because in general all it does is give fodder to stories that are written to make the disenfranchised party involved look awful, the bigot look like the victim, etc. Fueling increased hatred from bigots in general, who can look to the news for justification."
At least the NYDN, despite its sensationalistic reportage, gave the women a voice:
"He called us [homophobic slur] and he said he was going to f- us all," one of the women said hours later as cops led the seven suspects out of the 6th Precinct stationhouse.As my friend Caroline (who has vowed to write love letters to the women when they inevitably get sent to lockdown) remarked,
"He spit on us and threw a cigarette," another woman said. "This is a hate crime."
I wonder what the homophobic slur was. Muffdiver? Clammhuffer? Lickalottapus? Bulldagger?
I definitely support girl gangs kicking the shit out of shitty dudes. And especially whipping them with belts.
I'm still processing how intensely fucked up the media coverage of these black lesbians defending themselves has been (especially in the context of a recent uptick of anti-gay violence in New York, with a couple high-profile violent bashings). And I've read some fucked up reactions online, too.
So much of the story is so cinematic ("Foxfire!" as Caroline said). Here is Patreece's (severely tricked out) Myspace page, and here's Terrain's.
When Buckle hit on Johnson, she explained that she wasn't interested in men. Apparently offended, he spat on her, witnesses said....
"He made the mistake of spitting at one of them. They beat him up bad with belts, kicked and punched him," said Diego Rodriguez, 60...
"She's my girl, and no one spits on my girl!" one of the women yelled during the bloody beatdown.
14 Comments:
At 2:05 AM, Antid Oto said…
I draw the line at stabbing them. Stabbing people who say bigoted things or even spit at you is no go.
Also, your first link is broken.
At 11:26 AM, Solomon Grundy said…
Right, but it's not really a question of approving of stabbing someone. It's a question of at least trying to report the nuances of a complicated situation in which no one is completely innocent or guilty.
And then there's the question of sensationalizing the sexual and racial aspects of the story, which is par for the course for the tabloids, but supposedly not the business the NY Times is in (so it's ironic that the Times got it so much more wrong than the NYDN).
There are such strong parallels to Aileen Wuornos. I've never seen Monster, but I've seen the documentaries about her, and the distorted media portrayal was heartbreaking, because she really truly believed the truth would out, and it never did. Instead it was one last gross injustice.
And Emma, yeah, thanks, I fell a little bit in love with Terrain after reading her Myspace page. Didn't you?
At 2:50 PM, Antid Oto said…
I just now noticed that both the Times and Daily News called Wayne Buckle, the beatee, an "independent filmmaker" rather than a "DVD bootlegger." Much the way one might use "horticulturalist" to describe one's "pot dealer."
At 5:02 PM, Solomon Grundy said…
from Neda Cole (via email):
I totally agree with you. I was disgusted at the bias in the reporting. You’d think in 2006 in a big city you’d get a less obviously racist and homophobic take from a “legitimate” newspaper. I don’t know why you’d think because clearly the world is going to shit and any movement towards tolerance on any level has been almost totally reversed but I reserve the right to be disgusted. I almost a little bit agree with Antid Oto that it would be easier to be sympathetic if they had stopped at beating him with belts and left the steak knife at home in the kitchen drawer but I agree with you too that that’s beside the point.
You know in Dubai if a man harrasses a woman in a public place all she has to do is alert any security guard/policeman/ person in uniform and he gets his photo printed the next day in the national newspaper with details of his behaviour? Name and shame.. Love it.. Totally undemocratic but really rewarding when you meet a creep in the mall, and means lesbians don’t have to carry steak knives to defend their honour.
At 12:50 AM, Solomon Grundy said…
Hey Blair, sorry to ruin your day.
Good letter to the editor. I completely agree that this had to be understood in the context of defending themselves from his assault (spitting is a physical assault in New York City). I'm no lawyer, but I do suspect that the stabbing went beyond the bounds of what's considered self defense. However, that has to be understood in the context of constant, vicious, violent street harassment and gay bashing.
And as I wrote before, It's a question of at least trying to report the nuances of a complicated situation in which no one is completely innocent or guilty.
At 12:56 AM, Solomon Grundy said…
To anonymous who writes that "Beating them up and stabbing them does not establish the nobility of your character or your cause; it makes you worse than the bigoted asshole who insulted you to begin with."
I have to ask why it makes you "worse" than the bigoted asshole? It seems to at most make you no better than him. Do we victims of harassment have a greater obligation to be polite and turn the other cheek or something? To the contrary, I'd say it's more justifiable, since it's in self defense (at least in this type of situation, when the asshole spit on them).
Although no, I probably would not "condone" the stabbing, whatever "condone" means in this case. All I was saying is that the stabbing should have been discussed more responsibly and fairly, as something that happened in the context of self defense.
I was just mugged, and I felt so much better that I fought back, as opposed to the last time when I didn't.
At 4:45 PM, Anonymous said…
I AM THE MAN THAT GOT STABBED. I JUST GOT OUT THE HOSPITAL, AND I JUST PASSED THIS SITE, AND I AM DISGUSTED. I AM ONLY GIVING YOU GUYS A BRIEF STATEMENT, BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT WORTH MY TIME. FIRST OFF, THESE WILD PEOPLE STABBED A INNOCENT MAN, AND I AM NOT A BOOTLEGGER, WHICH IS AN ILLEGAL TRADE, BUT A PROFESSIONAL FILMMAKER, AND I AM NOT PART OF A STREET GANG. THE FACT THAT YOU ARE SLANDERING MY NAME AND DO NOT KNOW ALL OF THE FACTS IS BLASPHEMOUS.
THESE PEOPLE ARE IN JAIL BECAUSE OF A SAVAGE ACT. TO GET THE RECORD STRAIGHT, I SAID "HELLO, HOW ARE YOU DOING" TO ONE OF THE GIRLS, THEN HER FAT FRIEND STARTED TO VERBALLY ASSAULT ME, AND THEN HER OTHER FRIENDS CAME AND STARTED TO VERBALLY ASSAULT ME. ONE OF THE GIRLS THEN SPAT ON ME, SO I SPAT BACK, AND THEN THEY ALL JUMPED ME AND STABBEB ME, THEY WERE STILL JUMPING ME EVEN AFTER I GOT STABBED.
THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING AND MY STORY WILL PREVAIL, THIS VIOLENT ACT IS COMPLETELY UNPROVOKED AND IS A SIGN OF THE TIMES AHEAD, WHERE ANGER AND ANIMOSITY PREVAILS.
FOR THE RECORD, MY MYSPACE PAGE IS
www.myspace.com/dwaynebucklefilm
and my other websites are
www.TheMinorityMovie.Com
www.360soundandvision.com
and you can look my credentials up on IMDB.com
PEACE- YOU HATE-MONGERS - THE TRUTH WILL PREVAIL
At 4:55 PM, Solomon Grundy said…
Well, it will all come out in court.
The Daily News cited witnesses who corroborated the women's story rather than Mr. Buckle's, but who really knows. I wasn't there.
I was probably premature in taking the side of the women, but then again the NYT coverage was so biased that it was hard not to react against that.
At the very least the NYT should have interviewed the women. That's what this post is really about.
At 5:37 PM, Antid Oto said…
Since I was the one who made the "bootlegger" comment I'll also explain: that's how the Daily News described you when it first ran the pictures. The unexplained change--without correction, so far as I could tell--seemed fishy. But since you do appear to be a filmmaker after all, I apologize.
At 2:28 PM, Anonymous said…
I have NO apologies to make to mr. buckle. He still can't understand the situation in an historical & daily perspective of wimmin & queer people being consistently assulted, harrassed & incorrectly portrayed all over. Maybe mr. buckle, you just shouldn't try to pick up a girl on the street...or in your words..'just saying hello'. I don't walk down the street to be harrassed & then worry about offending my harrasser with my action or reaction. We're not here for you. Leave us alone you hate monger!
At 2:45 PM, Anonymous said…
ALSO, just because you are an independent filmmaker '& like to read deep stuff' doesn't make you a more credible cat caller.
At 6:44 PM, Solomon Grundy said…
My personal favorite line in his Myspace profile was "I like to read deep stuff, like the Bible."
At 4:14 PM, Anonymous said…
To right & wrong-
Just because nobody catcalls you, don't hold it against all the other women, who might enjoy the attention. First off, Mr Buckle, explained he said "hi, how are you doing" which is not a cat call, but a friendly gesture, similar to the one I used at meeting my girlfriend of 4 years. Its funny, but I see young lesbian women catcall other women, sometimes harder and more blatently than I see men do it, so what do you say about them? Face it, these are the new times, and this whole incident is not a good thing for the progressive movement for gay rights. It seems more and more each day,that straight people might need rights defending themselves from the gays.
At 9:51 PM, Anonymous said…
well, mr. right, i'm not convinced that buckle's version of events is accurate. that's his side, but that's only one side. i wasn't there, of course, but the daily news cited a bunch of witnesses who backed up the story of the lesbians (that buckle spat on them before they spat on him, that he was talking shit to them, etc.).
somehow i doubt that he got stabbed merely for saying hey how you doin. but who knows, maybe he's an innocent victim. but not according to everyone else who was at the scene. (but i don't want to convict him in the court of public opinion, since this isn't a courtroom and we don't know all the facts)
Post a Comment
<< Home