Left Behinds

The anti-andrewsullivan.com. Or, the Robin Hood (Maid Marian?) of bright pink Blogger blogs.

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Hmmm. I can see the logic.

The Bush administration last year quietly rewrote the rules for allowing gays and lesbians to receive national-security clearances, drawing complaints from civil rights activists.

The Bush administration said security clearances cannot be denied "solely on the basis of the sexual orientation of the individual." But it removed language saying sexual orientation "may not be used as a basis for or a disqualifying factor in determining a person's eligibility for a security clearance."
...
Several million civilian and military personnel who work for the U.S. government and its contractors must go through extensive reviews to determine if they've exhibited behavior that could compromise national security or make them susceptible to blackmail.


So what they must really be worried about is closeted people, right? I mean if you're out, you can't be blackmailed. I suggest they start with really important holders of national security clearances like, let's see, him. Or him.


Tags: , , ,

1 Comments:

  • At 5:15 PM, Blogger Solomon Grundy said…

    LOL, exactly. Openly gay people are not blackmail risks at all. It's the J Edgar Hoovers (and Scott McClellans and Karl Roves) of the world they have to worry about.

    And what about Condi and Harriet Miers? I haven't seen that many never-married, never-with-a-man women since the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival.

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

 
FREE hit counter and Internet traffic statistics from freestats.com